Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Epic Systems Corp. v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

April 1, 2016

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED and TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION d/b/a TCA America, Defendants. DAVID G. JONES (September 22, 2015) Plaintiff’s Designations Plaintiff’s Amended Designations Defendants’ Objections Defendants’ Counter-Designations Plaintiff’s Objections to Counter-Designations Rulings

ORDER

WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge

Having reviewed plaintiff’s amended deposition designations (dkt. #745) and defendants’ amended objections and counter-designations (dkt. #764), the court makes the following rulings as to witness: David Jones. The approved designations may be presented to the jury unless the witness is available to testify in person. Plaintiff shall remove all objections and any other asides or discussions between counsel and/or with the court reporter, even where not noted by the court in its rulings.

DAVID G. JONES (September 22, 2015)

Plaintiff’s Designations

Plaintiff’s Amended Designations

Defendants’ Objections

Defendants’ Counter-Designations

Plaintiff’s Objections to Counter-Designations

Rulings

35:13-37:9

Retained as to 35:13-36:22

35:25-36:3 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 36:5-8 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 36:18-21 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

Overruled as to 35:25-36:3;

sustained as to 36:18-21

39:11-40:9

Retained as to 39:19-40:9

39:19-40:4 This testimony should be struck pursuant to

Overruled

Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

40:11-41:8

Retained as to 40:11-13, 40:20-41:8

40:20-41:2 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

Overruled

43:11-44:1

Retained

43:11-25 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

Overruled as to 43:11-12; sustained as to 43:13-44:1

44:9-47:25

Retained

45:1-2 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting

Overruled at to 45-46; sustained as to 47

cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 45:4-11 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 45:13-17 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 45:25-46:4 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

46:6-10 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 47:1-4 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 47:6-10 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 47:12-19 This testimony should be struck pursuant to

Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

48:2-49:4

Retained

48:5-13 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

Sustained

49:6-51:11

Retained

49:11-16 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 49:21-50:3 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting

Overruled as to 49:11-16; sustained as to 49:21-50:3, 50:5-11, 50:18-21, 50:23-51:4

cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 50:5-11 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 50:18-21 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A) 50:23-51:4 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exh. 4A)

55:24-58:3

Retained as to 56:9-10, 56:16-58:3

57: 3-5 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit) 57:7-12 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit) 57:17-19 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit) 57:21-23 This testimony should be struck pursuant to

Overruled

Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit)

60:1-8

Retained

60:1-4 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit)

Overruled

60:10-61:15

Retained

Relevance. 60:14-18 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit) 60:23-61:1 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly

Overruled

presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit)

61:21-62:6

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Sustained

62:8-63:9

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Sustained

63:22-64:5

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Sustained

64:11-25

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

65:9-66:6

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

66:9-67:14

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

70:18-72:13

Retained

Relevance; cumulative 71:13-18 This testimony should be struck pursuant to Rule 403 because it is needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. (Reading from Exhibit)

Overruled as to 70:18-71:25;

sustained as to 72:1-13

73:9-21

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

73:23-75:2

Retained as to 73:23-74:11

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

75:22-76:18

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled

77:11-23

Retained

Relevance; cumulative

Overruled as ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.