Buy This Entire Record For
Wright v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept. of Corrections
United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
September 29, 2016
JASON LEE WRIGHT, Plaintiff,
SAUK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SAUK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, SAUK COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS UNIT #811 PAROLE AND PROBATION, NICKY DOBBS, REEDSBURG POLICE DEPT., DAVID ANDERSON, SRGT LAATSCH, SRGT SCHLOUGH, SRGT WILSON, SRGT GOLDEN, SRGT HAMER, DEPUTY PAPARA, SCHULTZ, M. SPOKE COOK, C. KELLER #9318, KOLIKOWSKI #9312, MACASKILL #9376, KEVIN STAUM #9319, BENESH #9362 VAN DEN HEUVEL, STEVE #9345, D. BERGMAN, W. NEUBAUER, BECKY BENNETT, GIESE, ROCKWIELER, T. COOK BRYCE TRAGGER #9355, C. FISK #9381, T. HOLLOWAY, T. GRUBER, D. WEINBERGER #9384, M. COOK #9383 CARROLL #9325, SAUK COUNTY JAIL NURSE, SAUK COUNTY DETECTIVE OF THE JAIL CORRUPT, SHANNON, Secretary receptionist, Sauk County Public Defender's office, DEBRA V. O'ROURKE, RANDALL HOLTZ, MARK D. LAWTON, GOMZ MARK #1032914, KATHY LAATSCH, CFS Supervisor, JENNIFER SOKOW, ANNA SHERMAN #8407 SRGT M. EBERLE, Reedsburg Police Dept. #137 OFFICER W. BOTTEN #140, BARABOO POLICE DEPT., OFFICER PICKLER, VICKIE MEISTER, Sauk County Clerk of Court, DEBBIE WESTERWELLE, GUY REYNOLDS, Branch #3, DETECTIVE LUSKI, MARK FRANK #1019391, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE VICTIMS WITNESS UNIT, SUE MOELLUER, SVD BUILDING JEROME, TONYA SHELDON, DEPT. MANAGER RICHARD, (HR) JESSICA, KELLY, MAIN BUILDING, ETHAN, KERRY, LINDA, ONEAL, BOB MARSHALL, Dept. Manager, SEATS, INC. (SVD BUILDING), SEATS, INC. (MAIN BUILDING), GREGORY AND LAVONNE SCHMIDT, BRANDON PARKER, CHRISTINE ESPINOZA, CASEY MUNDITH, CAROLYN LEIGH, TONYA BRONDT, KATHY L. KNIGHT, MELISSA PARKS, ROBERTA WILSON, MICHELLE, GARY NELSON, JR., ASHLEY CARRIG, ALEX KROLILKOWSKI, TOW TRUCK COMPANY, STEVES AUTO, T. KNUTH and J. SPEERS, Defendants.
BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge.
order dated July 13, 2016, I dismissed plaintiff Jason Lee
Wright's complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted and I directed the clerk of court
to enter judgment. Dkt. ##16 and 17. On August 31, 2016,
plaintiff filed an untitled document. Like the other
documents plaintiff has filed, the handwriting is difficult
to read and the content of the document is difficult to
understand. However, plaintiff seems to be raising two issues
in the document: (1) officials at the Sauk County jail (where
plaintiff is incarcerated) have been violating his rights
since he filed this lawsuit; and (2) plaintiff wants more
time to file a second amended complaint so that he can
clarify the claims he raised on his first two complaints.
cannot provide relief to plaintiff with respect to either of
these issues. It is too late for plaintiff to file another
amended complaint. Once a district court enters judgment, a
party has 28 days to seek reconsideration of the decision
under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). The court has no authority to
extend that deadline under any circumstances. Banks v.
Chicago Bd. of Education, 750 F.3d 663, 666 (7th Cir.
2014). Because plaintiff's 28-day deadline passed in the
middle of August, plaintiff's August 31, 2016 motion is
Civ. P. 60 allows a party to seek relief from a judgment
after the 28-day deadline in extraordinary circumstances,
Nash v. Hepp, 740 F.3d 1075 (7th Cir. 2014), but
plaintiff has not shown that such circumstances exist in this
case. He alleges generally that jail officials interfered
with his ability to litigate and “caused [his] case to
be dismissed, ” but that is incorrect. I dismissed the
complaint because the only claims plaintiff identified in his
complaint were barred by the statute of limitations. In any
event, plaintiff has not identified any specific way that a
jail official has prevented him from communicating with the
court or drafting his complaint.
extent that plaintiff believes that jail officials have
violated his rights after he filed this lawsuit, he is free
to raise those claims in a new lawsuit, but, again, it is too
late to amend his complaint in this case.
ORDERED that plaintiff Jason Lee Wright's document, which
I construe as a motion for reconsideration and a motion for