Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pliska v. Shawano County Jail

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

March 9, 2018

JACOB M. PLISKA, Plaintiff,
v.
SHAWANO COUNTY JAIL, MD KEN ANOLIGO, CO PATTI, CHRIS REKOSKE, TYLOR RICH, AND ODESSO CLAY, Defendants.

          SCREENING ORDER

          NANCY JOSEPH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         Jacob M. Pliska, who is representing himself, is confined at the Shawano County Jail. This matter is before me to screen the second amended complaint.

         Standard of Review for Screening Second Amended Complaint

         The Court shall screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious, ” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

         To state a cognizable claim under the federal notice pleading system, Pliska is required to provide a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that [he] is entitled to relief[.]” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). Pliska need not plead specific facts and his statement need only “give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). However, a complaint that offers mere “labels and conclusions” or a “formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). To state a claim, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, “that is plausible on its face.” Id. (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570). “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). The complaint's allegations “must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555 (citation omitted).

         In considering whether a complaint states a claim, courts should follow the principles set forth in Twombly by first, “identifying pleadings that, because they are no more than conclusions, are not entitled to the assumption of truth.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679. Legal conclusions must be supported by factual allegations. Id. If there are well-pleaded factual allegations, the court must, second, “assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.” Id.

         To state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that: 1) he was deprived of a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States; and 2) the deprivation was visited upon him by a person or persons acting under color of state law. Buchanan-Moore v. County of Milwaukee, 570 F.3d 824, 827 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Kramer v. Village of North Fond du Lac, 384 F.3d 856, 861 (7th Cir. 2004)); see also Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 (1980). The Court is obliged to give Pliska's pro se allegations, “however inartfully pleaded, ” a liberal construction. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)).

         Second Amended Complaint's Allegations

         On June 2, 2017, Pliska was “on the run” when around 10:30, defendant Chris Rekoske and two other Shawano deputies dispatched to an “em1 situation.” (ECF No. 15 at 2.) During a struggle to get handcuffs on his wrist, Pliska began to have a seizure when the deputy decentralized him. Later, a deputy put a shoe in Pliska's mouth to protect his head from the ground.

         On June 18, 2017, while at the Shawano County Jail, Pliska had another inmate hit the emergency intercom for him. Jail staff had placed Pliska in a receiving cell to be monitored with a roll of toilet paper contaminated with someone else's blood. Pliska struggled to hit the button but then he fell and could not move or talk. He laid in a puddle of drool and urine for close to an hour before he received new linen.

         On June 19, 2017, Pliska asked for a new roll of “TP” from defendant CO Patti. She gave him a new roll, but only after he asked again.

         On June 21, 2017, Pliska had a seizure while in the C pod. Jail staff told him to stop “faking.” Pliska was not placed in a receiving cell or in the restraint chair.

         On August 27, 2017, defendant Nurse Tylor Rich denied Pliska his medication because Pliska wrote him a note revoking “HSC” ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.