Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

April 11, 2019

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

          CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -87)

         On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See29OF.Supp.3d 1375 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 1, 373 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.

         It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster.

         Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.

         This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

         SCHEDULE CTO-87-TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A. NO.

CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA

AZ

4

19-00166

Pima, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al

AZ

4

19-00167

Tucson, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al

MINNESOTA

MN

0

19-00875

Winona County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NH

1

19 00325

Strafford County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et alOpposed 4/10/19

NH

1

19-00326

Belknap County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et alOpposed 4/10/19

NH

1

19-00328

Cheshire County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et alOpposed 4/10/19

NH

1

19 00329

Belmont, NH, Town of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. e O t p a p l osed 4/10/19

NH

1

19 00331

Claremont, NH, City of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. O et p a po l sed 4/10/19

NH

1

19 00332

Grafton County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et alOpposed 4/10/19

NH

1

19-00333

Rockingham County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

NH

1

19-00334

Sullivan County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al Opposed 4/10/19

NORTH DAKOTA

ND

3

19-00055

Cass County, North Dakota et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

OKLAHOMA EASTERN

OKE

6

19-00100

Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al Opposed 4/10/19

OKLAHOMA NORTHERN

OKN

4

19-00171

City of Owasso v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al Opposed 4/10/19

OKLAHOMA WESTERN

OKW

5

19 00280

Yukon City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al Opposed 4/10/19

WISCONSIN WESTERN

WIW

3

19-00229

Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. McKesson Corporation et al


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.