Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stinson v. Gauger

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

June 24, 2019

ROBERT LEE STINSON, Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES GAUGER, et al., Defendants.

          ORDER RULING ON OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS OF DR. GREGORY GOLDEN (DKT. NO. 350, 351)

          HON. PAMELA PEPPER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page Number of Designation

Objection

Ruling

Plaintiff's Designations

Defendants' Objections

62:13-23

Duplicative, repetitive of Senn, if plaintiff does not call Senn, no objection

Overruled.

115:23-116:20

Duplicative, repetitive of Senn, if plaintiff does not call Senn, no objection

Overruled.

119:2-19

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Johnson MIL #15 Dkt. No. 226; Dkt. No. 197 MIL #2, Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained-strike 119:2-19.

121:2

Objection to first sentence only “Well, it certainly was not routine”-Johnson MIL #15, dkt. no. 226; Dkt. No. 196 MIL #2; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

121:15

Objection beginning from line 15 at “. . . but it's defeating . . . .” - Johnson MIL #15, Dkt. no. 226; Dkt. no. 197 MIL #2, Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

122:8-123:9

Dkt. No. 226 at #15; Dkt. no. 197 #2; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

126:11-25

Dkt. no. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 #2; 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

127:12-128:5

Dkt. no. 226 at #15, Dkt. no. 197, #2, Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained as to 127:12-16.

Overruled as to 127:17-128:5.

142:20-143:4

Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

164:16-166:11

Objection beginning from line 16 at “But what they . . .” Rule 401, 402, 403, 602; Dkt. No. 226 at #15, Dkt. no. 197 at #2.

Overruled.

164:16 (starting with “But what they”- 166:11

Rules 401, 402, 403, 602, Dkt. No. 226 at #15, Dkt. no. 197 at #2,

Duplicate of the previous objection- overruled.

194:5-8

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, if not calling Senn, we'd agree to this questioning

Overruled.

194:25-195:10

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, if not calling Senn, we'd agree to this questioning

Overruled.

200:17-202:12

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #15, Dkt. no. 197 at #2; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

207:10-209:3

Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18

Overruled.

210:18-25

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18

Sustained.

212:17-213:2

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18

Overruled.

213:8-12

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18

Sustained-cumulative.

214:3-9

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18

Overruled.

215:12-217:8

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403, 602

Sustained as to all but 216:1-3, starting with “it was not acceptable.”

221:10-222:5

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, if not calling Senn, we'd agree to this questioning

Overruled.

222:15-223:5

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, if not calling Senn we'd agree to this questioning

Overruled.

226:22-227:7

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403, 602

Sustained.

229:13-230:14

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

231:7-231:19

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn; Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained-duplicative of Senn and Brummit.

232:16-233:12

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained-duplicative of Senn and Brummit.

233:21-238:3

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled as to 233:21-25 and 234:1-235:3.

Overruled as to 235:4, but strike the words “and Morgan.”

Overruled as to 235:5-236:1.

Sustained as to 236:2-237:5.

Overruled as to 237:6-238:3.

243:4-244:16

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

245:8-245:21

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, Dkt. No. 226 at #13, #15; Dkt. no. 197 at #2 (I, III) p. 3, 18; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled as to 245:8-17.

Sustained as to 245:18-21.

255:24-256.10

Duplicative and repetitive of Senn, if not calling Senn we'd agree to this questioning.

Overruled.

Defendants' Designations

Plaintiff's Objections

28:18-29:4

Rules 602, 401, 402, 403, and 702

Sustained.

31:16-24

Plaintiff's MIL #5-ABFO ethical violation is bared; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

44:19-45:7

Dkt. no. 287-Daubert ruling excluding expert testimony on cross-examination; Dkt. No. 215; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

46:15-47:15

Dkt. No. 214-bar development in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403, 702

Overruled.

56:17-57:6

Rules 401, 402, 403 and 602

Overruled.

58:3-9

Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

72:3-73:15

Dkt. No. 282; Dkt. No. 215- bar state of mind testimony; Rules 602, 401, 402, 403

Overruled as irrelevant.

82:4-83:15

Cumulative

Overruled as to 82:4-10.

Sustained on relevance grounds as to 82:11-83:15.

83:12-15

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, and 403

Duplicative-already sustained in previous ruling.

83:21-84:20

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

84:22-85:19

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained-can't tell timeframe.

87:9-15

Rules 401, 402, and 403

Overruled.

128:6-10

Dkt. No. 287-Daubert ruling barring Morgan report; Dkt. no. 213; Rules 401, 402, & 403

Sustained.

135:5-136:4

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled as to 135:5-19.

Sustained as to 135:20-136:4.

140:2-10

Dkt. No. 213; Rules 602, 401, 402, 403

Sustained as to 140:2-5.

140:6-10 does not appear to be designated. If it had been, the court would require it to be stricken.

144:20-24

Object rule of completeness. Needs counter designation

Overruled.

146:23 -147:9

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 217; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

150:25-151:15

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

152:15-152:22

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

153:22-25

Rules 602, 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

154:10-24

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

155:25-156:4

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled.

156:7-18

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Overruled as to 156:7-11.

Sustained as to 156:12-18.

192:17-193:19

Relevance. Cumulative. MIL.

Overruled as to 192:17-193:6.

Sustained as to 193:7-19.

256:22-257:12

Rules 401, 402, & 403

Sustained.

262:13-263:20

Rule 403

Sustained.

263:22-264:1

Rule 403

Overruled.

264:13-265:14

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214- bar changes in bite mark science/unfair to judge by today's standards; Rules 401, 402, 403

Sustained.

Plaintiff's Counter Designations

28:6-17

No objection

46:6-14

No objection

58:10-14

No objection

58:17-23

No objection

59:11-60:24

No objection

87:16-18

No objection

144:3-19

No objection

Defendants' Counter Designations

Plaintiff's Objections

24:12-14

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214; Changes in bite mark science barred; Rules 401, 402 & 403

Sustained-irrelevant.

24:20-25:2

Dkt. No. 287; Dkt. No. 214; Changes in bite mark science barred; Rules 401, 402 & 403

Sustained.

26:18-24

No objection

28:1-6

Incomplete Rule of

completeness require Plaintiff's counter designation, 28:6-17

Sustained-do not strike but include 28:6-17.

65:6-9

No objection

66:10-15

No objection

116:21-23

No objection

209:4-9

Dkt. No. 287 & Plaintiff's MIL #2-changes to bite mark science; Dkt. No. 226

Sustained.

213:3-6

No objection

214:13-16

No objection

214:19-215:11

No objection

221:6-9

No objection

222:6-12

No objection

228:18-229:6

Rule of completeness. Requires counter designation of 229:7-12

Sustained-do not strike but add 229:7-12.

230:15-20

Rules 602; Rules 401, 402 & 403

Sustained.

245:22-25

No objection

246:4

No objection

246:10-12

No objection


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.